On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 4:06 AM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Thx for elaborating about the discussed topics 👍
Indeed! This is much appreciated. josh > > > Vít > > > > Dne 01. 04. 25 v 21:31 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > ===================================== > > # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco > > ===================================== > > > > Meeting started by @decathorpe:fedora.im at 2025-04-01 17:01:10 > > > > Summaries for individual topics provided by decathorpeLLM. 😉 > > > > Meeting summary > > --------------- > > * TOPIC: Roll Call (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 17:01:42) > > * LINK: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/PUJKSYSMP5QZ4L4LRYJZ3CJIYMUSJRYQ/ > > (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 17:05:56) > > > > * TOPIC: #3364 F42 Incomplete Changes Report (@decathorpe:fedora.im, > > 17:06:28) > > * LINK: > > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-42/f-42-key-tasks.html > > (@salimma:fedora.im, 17:17:43) > > * AGREED: The Idris 2 Change Proposal is re-targeted at Fedora 43, > > but the package can still land in Fedora 42 as a normal "newpackage" > > update at any time. (+7, 1, -0) (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 17:33:38) > > * INFO: All other previously-incomplete Changes for Fedora 42 are > > either complete, testable, or in-progress. (@decathorpe:fedora.im, > > 17:34:03) > > > > We concluded that all F42 Changes previously listed as "incomplete" > > are now either complete, testable, or sufficiently in-progress, with > > the exception of the Self-Contained Change Proposal for providing a > > package for Idris 2. The package Review Request for idris2 is in > > progress, but with the Final Freeze having gone into effect today, > > landing this package in time for the Fedora 42 release is unlikely. As > > such, we have decided to re-target the Change Proposal to Fedora 43 > > (mostly for the purpose of setting expectations, and proper > > documentation in release notes - because this package will likely not > > be ready on "day one" - or even "day minus one" for reviewers of > > Fedora 42). > > > > * TOPIC: Change: Fix limitations in gpgverify (@decathorpe:fedora.im, > > 17:36:39) > > * AGREED: Change is approved with the modification that gpgverify > > will become a separate package. (+6, 1, -0) (@decathorpe:fedora.im, > > 17:58:07) > > * INFO: The Change Proposal document will be updated accordingly. > > (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 17:58:26) > > > > We discussed this Change Proposal with the Change Owner, who was > > present during the meeting. Since a number of FESCo members (and > > redhat-rpm-config package maintainers) would prefer this Change to be > > implemented in a standalone package instead of adding it to > > redhat-rpm-macros directly, the Proposal will be adapted and discussed > > again when ready. > > > > * TOPIC: Change: Disabling Support of building OpenSSL engines > > (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 17:59:44) > > * AGREED: FESCo rejects this Change Proposal, and requests that > > OpenSSL Engine functionality is not dropped earlier than the OpenSSL > > (pre-)release where this functionality is dropped upstream. (+8, 0, > > -0) (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 18:09:13) > > > > This proposal had already collected six -1 votes during in-ticket > > voting for various reasons. We agreed that the proposed change was > > premature, with no release date for an OpenSSL version that drops this > > functionality upstream on the horizon. Additionally, breaking builds > > of packages while keeping them installable and working causes pain for > > affected package maintainers, and also prevents shipping *any* package > > updates for affected packages despite them still being included and > > installable from Fedora repositories. > > > > * TOPIC: Change: Java25 and No More System JDK (@decathorpe:fedora.im, > > 18:11:36) > > * AGREED: The "Java25 and No More System JDK" Change Proposal will > > be discussed at next week's FESCo meeting (April 8, 2025). The > > Proposal Owners are invited to join. (+7, 0, -0) > > (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 18:17:30) > > > > Since many FESCo members had not yet kept up with the discussion of > > this Change Proposal, we decided to postpone discussing it to next > > week, and invited the Change Owner to join. > > > > * TOPIC: Pending changes for FESCo docs (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 18:18:30) > > > > It is currently not explicitly clear whether fesco-docs tickets and > > pull-requests should (or should not) be processed the same way as > > "regular" fesco tickets, which often leads to them being overlooked > > for longer periods of time. Since documentation is important, it would > > be good to improve our process around fesco documentation. A follow-up > > ticket was filed here: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3387 > > > > * TOPIC: Next Week's 🪑 (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 18:23:43) > > * ACTION: Fale to chair next week's FESCo meeting on April 8, 2025 > > (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 18:24:59) > > > > * TOPIC: Open Floor (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 18:25:11) > > > > Meeting ended at 2025-04-01 18:30:13 > > > > Action items > > ------------ > > * Fale to chair next week's FESCo meeting on April 8, 2025 > > > > People Present (lines said) > > --------------------------- > > * @decathorpe:fedora.im (120) > > * @zbyszek:fedora.im (48) > > * @conan_kudo:matrix.org (40) > > * @sgallagh:fedora.im (38) > > * @nirik:matrix.scrye.com (31) > > * @zodbot:fedora.im (25) > > * @salimma:fedora.im (18) > > * @fale:fale.io (11) > > * @humaton:fedora.im (5) > > * @rombobeorn:fedora.im (5) > > * @emma:rory.gay (3) > > * @meetbot:fedora.im (3) > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
