On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 12:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 13. 03. 25 18:50, Milan Crha wrote: >> On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 00:11 +0100, Miro Hrončok via devel-announce >> wrote: >>> This change will land to rawhide first and later to all stable >>> releases as well. >> >> Hi, >> are you really going to intentionally break all the stable releases? I >> thought there is a strict policy, and a big no-no, to _not_ do any such >> thing. If you want to implement a breaking change, then do it strictly >> in the rawhide only. Possibly with a fedora change paperwork, maybe. >> >> Not that I mind of those packages, I do not use any of them, at least >> not directly, but seeing broken f40 or f41 this late does not sound >> right. The f42 might be out of question as well, from my point of view. > > Yes, that was my plan. > > The affected packages are already broken, but they build successfully (and > shouldn't). This was a long-standing bug, never an intended behavior. > > However, if people fight me on this, I am willing to reconsider. All affected > packagers maintainers were bcced both a month ago and now. >
I think this is fine. We don’t plan mass rebuilds for stable releases, it just means maintainers need to clean up the next time they need to update their packages, right? Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 README: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Salimma#README -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
