Dear Gary, On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 4:07 PM Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > Those are some high profile and/or important pieces of Fedora > functionality > > that seemingly depend on OpenSSL engines, and would (possibly[1]) need > fixing > > unless OpenSSL 3 is going to be kept in Fedora as a compat package in > parallel > > with OpenSSL 4 from F44 onwards ? > > While history may be different this time around, > openssl 1.x was kept around as a compat package > for around three years after openssl 3.x was > released (until after the major upstream dependent > packages had completed their migrations). AFAIK > no one has gone through and checked all the > current users of openssl 3.x in Fedora to see if > they are using deprecated functions, and have > opened PRs upstream to help those upstreams > remove those deprecated features, so the > transition could happen sooner than a few years. > Of course, your mileage will vary. > You are correct. But I would strictly separate deprecated functions and deprecated functions :) I'd expect that ENGINE will eventually be removed relatively soon (in 4.0), I'm not so sure about other deprecated API. -- Dmitry Belyavskiy
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
