Le 03/02/2025 à 15:12, Björn 'besser82' Esser a écrit :
Why there was no communication with us about the thing?
I never intended to build them; I just added the explicit BR so there
will be no fallout, when some time in the future libxcrypt-devel may not
be an implicit part of the buildroots anymore. The explicit BR on
libxcrypt-devel should have been in spec file since the times Fedora
changed from glibc libcrypt to libxcrypt some time ago.
Notice: this change was unneeded (ex for php)
where another BR was already present
Ex
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libxcrypt)
BuildRequires: libxcrypt-devel
The second, just added by your change does not make sense.
I will remove it.
Remi
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
