On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:00 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:42:17PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 1:26 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> > <s...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > We're currently in the middle of F42 branching + related freeze.
> > >
> > > > All builds that will be running at that time for the rawhide will be
> > > > canceled and can be resubmitted by maintainers after the branching.
> > > >
> > > > All rawhide updates that are pending for rawhide will be unpushed.
> > >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/HLQJ7KK4HQ2ROB3HCKAUN3PVZOXIZ6H7/
> >
> > Yes, this was intentional. Maybe it would have been good to also add a
> > comment to those updates and not just unpush them.
>
> yeah. Sorry about that. Will add a note next time.
>
> > Updates that are stuck in "gating" (i.e. in "pending" or "testing"
> > state) during the mass branching will end up in a weird state, and
> > will always require manual action to fix and end up in a consistent
> > state.
> >
> > In most cases, submitting a new build for rawhide (now F43) and F42
> > should work (assuming the gating failures are taken care of, of
> > course).
>
> Yep. This ^
>

I guess it's partly my fault for not noticing that the update was "stuck"
but in my case, it's not a single build, but a soname bump and all
dependencies that got unpushed. Ugg....

Thanks,
Richard
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to