Hello FESCo, Peter, Packagers and all,
First of all, I'm not a packager, not even a developer, but as a former member of Marketing team as a former Council member, I think this is the time when damage control communication is needed. Peter: > I personally think FESCo should be referring the problem to the council > and stepping back from the entire process. > > IMO, you should go upfront and open a ticket for this by yourself, in my country there is a saying: "El que pega primero, pega dos veces", so if you already have doubts of the FESCo process, I recommend you to open the ticket. FESCo: Discussing things "privately", "internally" and all the words that have been used during the conversation, is not in the Spirit of Fedora. I recommend to go upfront and publishing absolutely everything unless there are legal issues that I highly doubt. Packagers: It's the moment that you act as a group and not individuals, I know and trust that you can find a way to speak as a solid unit and request this to be discussed with the Council in the openness. I don't want to sound like a troublemaker or firestarter, but IMO this should not be tolerated. Best regards, -- Eduard Lucena Móvil: +56962318010 GNU/Linux User #589060 Ubuntu User #8749 Fedora i3 SIG member
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
