On 12-12-2024 21:07, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
I hadn't, but that's a good idea. Here you are.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2332159
Thanks. I saw a handful of FTBFS/FTI bugs filed by a script[1].
Obviously that's just the tip of the iceberg and many more packages
started to fail when NumPy was updated.
I think it would be helpful to have bugs filed for all packages
currently failing due to NumPy 2.x, either directly or indirectly. Some
will be trivial to fix others will require more work (updates,
bootstrapping, etc). Having the bugs filed and linked the way it's done
during Python major version upgrades will allow us to get insight in the
dependency graph and where to direct effort to get and keep things moving.
If there's a script that can do that, that would be the preferred way.
But I'd also be willing to file bugs manually working my way through
packages I (co-)maintain. Having the bugs filed will also increase
visibility for package maintainers, I believe.
[1] https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
-- Sandro
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
