Il 18/11/24 16:34, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > On Mon, 2024-11-18 at 11:49 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> If there is something that the policy text says that is stronger than >> what Bodhi requires, then we should update the policy text immediately. > As of now there is not, because in 8.2 I made the tool to implement > what the policy says, which is the way around things ought to be. :D > Before 8.2, this was the case, yes. > -- > Adam Williamson (he/him/his) > Fedora QA > Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org > https://www.happyassassin.net > I tried to summarize currently applied settings in a table:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pPdWOX7YKSu-6pF6-20V7nECRdrHyj6xr4YEV54f_qo/edit?usp=sharing Where settings are absent, defaults are used. The idea is: an update can be pushed to stable either manually or automatically only after <mandatory_days_in_testing>, or before if it reaches <min_karma>. Autopush settings can be equal or greater. What is reported as "Stable by karma" in the Update page is just the autopush setting. Which can be confusing when the autopush is set to a higher value, so that we see, for example, "stable by karma = +5", but after +2 karma we get the "can be pushed to stable if maintainer wishes" message. Mattia -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
