Re: RFC: Moving to -O3 for Fedora Linux

[Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez]

I found some interesting ones [1][2]. The common denominator is that between -O2 and -O3, the runtime improvement is increased a little bit overall but in some cases it can be significant, while the power consumption also increases. The memory access also tends to decrease. None of those study analyze much memory consumption from mapped files. Not sure if it is a big deal.

[1] https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article-pdf/58/1/95/5071667/bxt129.pdf
[2] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8109001

On 10/30/24 10:37 PM, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:

Perhaps having a Fedora qcow2 image compiled with -O3 to compare would help to do some benchmarking and see.

It would be great to see some empirical analysis about binary size increase, its impact on RAM consumption, and actual speed benefit, especially on Fedora. I'm having a hard time finding anything about it.

Regards,
Carlos R.F.

On 10/30/24 7:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:

Hey folks,

I know the idea of moving to -O3 has been briefly mentioned before in
other contexts when we've discussed uplifting the flags, but it looks
like Ubuntu is moving to -O3 for Ubuntu 25.04[1]. Is there a reason
why we shouldn't consider doing the same for Fedora Linux 42?

[1]: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2024- October/043164.html

OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue