On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 03:21:47PM +0100, Marián Konček wrote: > Hi, AFAIK the current Fedora Guidelines allow documentation to be built > separately and bundled in the binary RPMs: > > * > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packaged/#prebuilt-binaries-or-libraries
That shouldn't be needed in this case. > On 29. 10. 2024 14:52, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > We still have i686 in Fedora for multilib use-cases. There's no > > expectation for i686 to be an install target, so maybe it would be > > acceptable to only build the docs on %java_arches and just exclude them > > on i686? That is the right approach. Koji allowed a noarch subpackage to be created only on some architectures. So just don't build the pam-doc subpackage on i686. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
