On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 15:02, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 20:01 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 14:13, Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > if anyone has an Intel-based Mac (Macbook, Mac Mini) which could be > used for dual-boot testing with Fedora 41, that would be very helpful. We > don't have any such hardware at hand at the moment. > > > > Yes. And already on it. > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test#Miscellaneous > > > > Okey-dokey, will keep you posted. Hope will manage to do it tonight > > because it's already 8pm here in the UK and I am still at the stage of > > reinstalling macOS. > > Note Igor had some issues with this, as anaconda (and lsblk) seem to > see his macOS partitions as just a blob with the label 'cs_fvault2', > which to me indicates they're under Apple's "FileVault" encryption > thingy. The test case doesn't account for this at all. > > Igor verified in macOS that filevault is set to 'disabled', but Neal or > Chris (I forget which) pointed out the filesystems might still be kept > in a sort of inactive filevault volume to allow for encryption to be > enabled again if desired. > > From googling around it looks like we *could* potentially support > accessing and even maybe installing into a filevault setup, since > cryptsetup supports it since 2022, but anaconda/blivet maybe just don't > have support for this wired up the way they do for LUKS. > > I'm not sure what we ought to do about this? Only support macOS dual > boot on systems on which filevault is completely and utterly inactive, > and document that in the test case? Lobby anaconda devs to use their > copious spare time to support filevault (hah)? Give up on macOS dual > boot as a supported/blocking case? > > I am not sure if filevault can be completely and utterly inactive with more recent versions of MacOS. I would give up on macOS dual boot as a blocking case. The intel hardware which it is on will be considered 'unsupported' by Apple soon (now depending on the system) and would probably be better as a single boot system for one or the other due to unfixable bugs on either side. > CCing devel@ as there may be more folks there with knowledge about > this. > -- > Adam Williamson (he/him/his) > Fedora QA > Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org > https://www.happyassassin.net > > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
