On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 5:50 AM Michael J Gruber <m...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Am Fr., 27. Sept. 2024 um 11:33 Uhr schrieb Florian Weimer > <fwei...@redhat.com>: > > > > Do you see any problems if glibc starts using /usr/etc/services if > > /etc/services does not exist? Same for /usr/etc/protocols, /usr/etc/rpc > > and so on. It's already used on openSUSE, apparently. > > > > And alternative proposal was to use /usr/share/services (which I really > > dislike), or /usr/share/nss/services (to which I do not have any > > objections). > > Is OpenSUSE the only precedent so far? >
Solus put everything in /usr/share/defaults (though I think "defaults" isn't the right name for this) long before openSUSE did /usr/etc. https://help.getsol.us/docs/user/software/configuration_files/ My preference would be /usr/share/<package>/<configroot> e.g. /usr/share/nss/services for nss services, /usr/share/pam/<pam.d/security> for pam stuff, etc. (We have /usr/share/pam.d, but when I tried to move sddm configs to it, it didn't take effect and I noticed pam isn't configured anymore for configs in /usr). -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
