Martin Gansser venit, vidit, dixit 2024-09-05 13:20:16:
> First i converting the specfile with:
> 
> [martin@fc40 SPECS]$ rpmautospec convert pyliblo3.spec 
> Converted to %autorelease and %autochangelog.
> 
> and then I create the src.rpm file with
> 
> [martin@fc40 SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bs pyliblo3.spec
> Einstellung SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1725494400
> Created: /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pyliblo3-0.16.2-1.fc40.src.rpm
> 
> but why is the src.rpm not created with the git extension ?
> pyliblo3-0.16.2-0.5.git91d1781.fc40.src.rpm
> 
> I would then like to import these with:
> fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pyliblo3-0.16.2-0.5.git91d1781.fc40.src.rpm

So I think the problem is more in the versionning itself.

First of all: Where does 0.16.2 come from? The latest upstream tag I see
is 0.12.

Important for autospec: You seem to be using the tradiotonal versionning
scheme which mixes version and release (part of version in the release
field). This cannot work with autorelease, as you found out. Please see

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/

for the current scheme. It includes examples for upstream version of the
type "named upstream release plus snapshot from git". You'd have to read
"release" as "released upstream version", not as something that goes
into our release field.

Cheers
Michael
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to