Dne 07. 08. 24 v 16:06 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):

Dne 07. 08. 24 v 15:20 Tom Hughes via devel napsal(a):
On 07/08/2024 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 01:09:01PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
With new RPM, I hit the limit in two packages:

https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-abrt

https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-pg

Is it RPM, or is it "rspec"?  Seems to be some sort of Ruby tool.

The first one is something I assume the test is doing... Perhaps
these ones using deliberately silly paths?

https://github.com/voxik/abrt-ruby/blob/5cd42e6cf6024e80cdccdf8c3ba2128f2717ab69/spec/abrt_handler_spec.rb#L122

The second one is less clear  - it doesn't seem to be using the
%postgresql_tests_run macro to start a postgres server for testing
so I assume the ruby tests are starting one themselves but in
a directory that has a long enough name that the socket name
is too long?


Yes, this is good analysis. It can hardly be expected that upstream test suite could leverage `%postgresql_tests_run` macro


Looking closer at the macro, maybe I should give it try.


Vít




I think the 107 bytes limitation is much sillier then the paths above.


Vít

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to