Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Yes, I believe there are high chances to accept this (much harder will > to prioritize the feature). If you know what you are doing, the point > should not be to make the prolonging process click-expensive - which it > admittedly is now, if you maintain dozens of long-term projects. Note > that OTOH I still think that *we all* should actively push our users to > evacuate EOL Fedora releases. > > IMO, the point is to keep the maintainer active, and get the response > periodically. But sure, once we have the RFE, we'll have a proper place > to discuss it with the rest of the Copr team.
OK, I have filed the RFE: https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/issues/3333 I would have marked it with the RFE label, but I am not allowed to set labels as the reporter, only team members can do that. Kevin Kofler -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
