Hi Neal, On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:02 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:43 PM Nathan Scott <nath...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:29 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > [...] > > > retaining Redis will just hurt us in the long term. > > > > Noone is saying we should retain Redis. I'm advocating for a more > > appropriate transition that is respectful of the work and expertise the > > existing package maintainers bring. > > > > I think f41 is appropriate and possible, but "more haste, less speed" > > is the way to get there, with minimal breakage to Fedora and users. > > > > From my perspective, I don't see any breakage happening. We also > haven't *done* anything yet. >
Sooo, about that... :) I see there is a valkey build winging its way toward f39 and f38 now: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=valkey If someone has an active redis installation on those systems and install that - aren't they in for a bit of a surprise? Correct me if I'm wrong, but this will replace redis - leaving /var/lib/redis with their current data, and start a new "redis-server" (aka "valkey-server") process writing into a new, empty rdb file below /var/lib/valkey, no? If so, how do they reconcile those split rdb files? Let's slow down a bit, it's not so urgent that we risk peoples data. cheers. -- Nathan -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
