On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 14:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

> unnoticed. There *are* still reasons to use the network service; I
> still use it on the openQA worker hosts, for instance, because there is
> integration between openvswitch and the legacy network service, but no
> integration between openvswitch and NetworkManager.

it seems since I last looked at this, NM has grown some level of
openvswitch support, but it seems to be limited, and I don't know off-
hand if it's sufficient for what openQA needs. I will need to look into
that.
https://github.com/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/blob/main/man/nm-openvswitch.xml
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to