On 31/03/2024 20.52, Christopher Klooz wrote:
On 31/03/2024 20.21, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31 2024 at 09:56:04 AM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
<mcatanz...@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm really frustrated with our communication regarding this issue. Does anybody
know who can fix this?
The Fedora Magazine article has been fixed (thanks!).
"*Fedora Linux 40 branched users (i.e. pre-Beta) likely received the potentially
vulnerable /5.6.0-2.fc40/ build
<https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4417db3376> if the system updated
between March 2nd and March 6th*. Fedora Linux 40 Beta users only using stable repositories are
NOT impacted. Fedora Linux 39 and 38 users are also NOT impacted."
-> only pre-beta, not beta, affected
-> F40 beta using stable NOT impacted (without challenging the previously
distributed assumption that testing is disabled by default)
That's still the same false information, isn't it?
Justin just has shown up in discourse. I suggested to get in touch with you,
Adam or Kevin since he seemed to be convinced the article is fine as it is.
When I refresh the article, it still seems to be unchanged. Is the update you
mean already online Michael?
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
