On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 6:28 PM Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> wrote:
> With a recent update, plplot is failing to build with:
>
> cd
> /builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/examples/fortran
> && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/x16af.dir/link.txt
> --verbose=1
> /usr/bin/gfortran -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed
> -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,-z,now
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld-errors
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -O2
> -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe
> -Wall -Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Werror=format-security
> -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1  -m64 -march=x86-64
> -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection
> -fcf-protection -mtls-dialect=gnu2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer
> -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -frecursive
> CMakeFiles/x16af.dir/x16af.f90.o -o x16af
> -Wl,-rpath,/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/bindings/fortran:/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/src:/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/lib/csa:/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/lib/nn:/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/lib/qsastime
> ../libplfortrandemolib.a
> ../../bindings/fortran/libplplotfortran.so.0.2.0
> -Wl,-rpath-link,/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/src:/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/lib/csa:/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/lib/nn:/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/lib/qsastime
> /usr/bin/ld: error: /tmp/cchkMGCX.ltrans0.ltrans.o: is triggering the
> generation of an executable stack (because it has an executable
> .note.GNU-stack section)
> /usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: No such file or directory
>
> I have no idea what is up here.
>
> Seems to have started with:
>
> gcc 14.0.1-0.7.fc41
> glibc 2.39.9000-3.fc41
> util-linux 2.40-0.9.rc1.fc41
> binutils 2.42.50-4.fc41
>
> and lots of others, but that seems the most likely.

At least one of the Fortran example programs (x09f) really does
require an executable stack.  This PR will work around the build issue
for now, but the reason why it requires an executable stack should be
investigated:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/plplot/pull-request/6

-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to