Am Do., 15. Feb. 2024 um 17:43 Uhr schrieb Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com>: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 5:30 PM Michael J Gruber <m...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: >> >> Yes. That is: running `/usr/lib/rpm/elfdeps --provides` on F39 against >> the two files libmupdf.so.23.10 rpmdev-extracted from the koji scratch >> builds for fc39 and el9 yields >> >> libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) >> >> in both cases. I could try and stuff %__elf_provides into the spec for >> a koji scratch debug run ... > > > Is libmupdf.so.23.10 executable? It used to be the case that the elf depgen > only ran on executable files, IIRC. Maybe that has changed in recent Fedoras, > but still is the case in el9?
Gotcha! You rock! Thanks a bunch. chmod +x'ing should be fine on Fedoras, as well. And from looking at /usr/lib64 it's common anyways. Michael -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
