* David Abdurachmanov:

> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:24 PM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Please try this:
>>
>> diff --git a/glibc.spec b/glibc.spec
>> index 6116752..e4d5e44 100644
>> --- a/glibc.spec
>> +++ b/glibc.spec
>> @@ -1571,6 +1571,10 @@ for lib in lib lib64;  do
>>                 set +x
>>                 slbase=$(basename $sl)
>>                 sltarget=$(basename $(readlink $sl))
>> +               if test "$sltarget" = . ; then
>> +                   # This is the lp64d symbolic link on riscv64, see above.
>> +                   continue
>> +               fi
>>                 if ! test -r usr/$lib/$sltarget; then
>>                     echo "$sl: inferred $sltarget ($(readlink $sl)) missing"
>>                     exit 1
>>
> Hi Florian,
>
> The above worked. See the build:
> http://fedora.riscv.rocks/koji/buildinfo?buildID=281296
>
> Could you land this change to glibc.spec?

Applied in glibc-2.39-2.fc40.

Thanks,
Florian
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to