Is it safe to assume that this symbolic link [/lib64 -> usr/lib64]
exists in all chroots?
This includes the initial ramdisk, recovery environments, and chroots
for confining services.

It is unsafe unless prominently documented in the places that are likely
to be seen by affected developers, now and especially *in the future*:
man glibc, info glibc, man chroot, info chroot, man docker, man virtmgr, etc.
Such a change has aspects of being a System-Wide Change for Fedora.
For instance, I have a recipe for an "embedded" Docker
that will have to add the symlink.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to