Is it safe to assume that this symbolic link [/lib64 -> usr/lib64] exists in all chroots? This includes the initial ramdisk, recovery environments, and chroots for confining services.
It is unsafe unless prominently documented in the places that are likely to be seen by affected developers, now and especially *in the future*: man glibc, info glibc, man chroot, info chroot, man docker, man virtmgr, etc. Such a change has aspects of being a System-Wide Change for Fedora. For instance, I have a recipe for an "embedded" Docker that will have to add the symlink. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
