On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 12:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +0000, Chris Kelley wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have a GitHub Action > > (https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794 > > 978022) that fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when > > using the rawhide docker image. I have been trying to keep up with > > the dnf/dnf5 revert story, but I may have missed something about > > the current state of affairs/expectations around it working without > > issue. I am not sure to whom I should raise this issue, any > > suggestions welcome - thanks! > > Not sure what the specific issue is here, but in general, we > recommend > against pulling from the Docker registry, as it is not updated very > often. It's much better to pull from registry.fedoraproject.org or > quay.io , as those are updated with every Rawhide compose.
Hi, It seems that https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora/tags/ is quite outdated (contrary to https://hub.docker.com/_/fedora ). This is quite bad, if I run podman run -ti fedora:39 it will get the image from registry.fedoraproject.org (due to /etc/containers/registries.conf). The problem is, that this image is from August and still points to Rawhide. So the first `dnf upgrade` installs fc40 packages, which results in a broken installation. Workaround: podman run -ti docker.io/fedora:39 Is this a known issue? Am I doing something wrong? Where would I report this? Thomas _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
