Hi Jelle, Thank you for the suggestion.
Upower is one of my backup plans and I plan to start to move all the ppd API and features to Upower. But considering the comment from Mark Pearson, tuned allows the vendor to implement their profile in a much more flexible manner. Also, tuned provides a set of dbus APIs to use so I think it is not difficult to integrate with GNOME applications. On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 AM Jelle van der Waa <je...@vdwaa.nl> wrote: > > On 06/11/2023 17:30, Allan Day wrote: > > Hi Kate, > > > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:30 AM Kate Hsuan <h...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> ... By > >> integrating power-profiles-daemon with tuned, the user can get extra > >> features to finetune the system, and the basic feature provided by ppd > >> can be used according to the user's demand. It also can reduce the > >> efforts of the maintainer. > > ... > >> Moreover, the detailed change proposal can be found here. > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TunedReplacesPower-profiles-daemon > > > > I just noticed that the change proposal contains the line: > > > > "We expected that the user can set those profile, tuned provided > > through gnome-control-panel. To minimize the information to the user, > > the power panel would provide a simple and advanced mode to show the > > power profiles. If the users want to finetune the system, they can > > switch to the advanced mode themselves." > > > > It's a bit unclear if this is a definite plan, a requirement, or more > > of a speculative ambition. However, I should probably be clear that > > from a GNOME design perspective, an advanced power profile settings > > mode would likely be a tough sell. Exposing arbitrary user-defined > > profiles would also pose some challenges which it might be difficult > > to overcome. > > > > If this change proposal does require UXD changes to GNOME, then I'd > > suggest reaching out to us in advance to discuss them. > > Wouldn't it also be logical for UPower to replace power-profiles-daemon? > UPower is already integrated into GNOME Settings while tuned is not, not > having an additional dependency might be nicer and beneficial for other > distributions which might not have a tuned package at all. > > Greetings, > > Jelle van der Waa > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- BR, Kate _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
