On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:09:08PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > These Fedora Project keys distribute in <https://fedoraproject.org/fedora.gpg> > are also affected: > > $ gpg --list-keys 6A2FAEA2352C64E5 > pub rsa4096 2013-12-16 [SCE] > 91E97D7C4A5E96F17F3E888F6A2FAEA2352C64E5 > uid [ neznámá ] Fedora EPEL (7) <e...@fedoraproject.org> > > $ gpg --list-keys 21EA45AB2F86D6A1 > pub rsa4096 2019-06-05 [SCE] > 94E279EB8D8F25B21810ADF121EA45AB2F86D6A1 > uid [ neznámá ] Fedora EPEL (8) <e...@fedoraproject.org> > > $ gpg --list-keys 7BB90722DBBDCF7C > pub rsa4096 2018-11-13 [SCE] [platnost skončí: 2028-12-31] > C2A3FA9DC67F68B98BB543F47BB90722DBBDCF7C > uid [ neznámá ] Fedora (iot 2019) <fedora-iot-2...@fedoraproject.org>
Yes. I think we should split the epel and fedora keys there (and the iot one isn't used for a long time and can be dropped). I don't think it makes much sense to force changes to the epel7/epel8 keys now just to check some compatibility box on fedora installs. ;) See https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11703 kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
