Dne 21. 08. 23 v 10:32 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
Over the time we had several workshops about SPDX. Some people did the SPDX
migrations for others (me included).
Some of the PR are not merged yet. E.g.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/251
The License: field is incomplete, it needs to pick up the autoconf
exception.
Fixed. Nice catch. Thank you.
In past I waited until it is merged. Now I plan to be more progressive
and I plan in these individual cases to:
1) create PR
2) wait 14 days
3) if there will be no response, the I will merge it as a proven packager.
I assume you plan to translate just the License: field and not look at
the actual license references in the source code for this. If that
approach is acceptable, package maintainers could do the same thing. It
would significantly speed up the conversion (e.g., no need to run
fossology).
No. I on these workshops we have done the full work. Not just plain translation of License field. But as you saw above -
nobody is perfect.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
