On Tuesday, 01 August 2023 at 12:16, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> With Avahi upstream maintainer hat on, I would say it still makes sense to
> have separate mdns*_minimal and mdns? modules. I would say mdns
> (non-minimal) should be rarely needed, because by default it should be used
> just for *.local names. As I have wrote to referenced ticket, I think we
> want to prefer mdns_minimal in the future, but it first needs solving
> increased timeouts for not present names [1]. As soon as it is solved on
> avahi-daemon side, we can deprecate mdns{4,6}_minimal and mdns{4,6}
> variants. If only one family should be resolved, I think it would be better
> to configure it on side of avahi-daemon.
Simpler is good if it still offers the features required by Fedora.
> I think mdns resolution needs smarter approach from avahi-daemon. It might
> be useful to not open and re-parse /etc/mdns.allow on every single
> ``getaddrinfo()`` call, but cache it in thread local storage and re-read its
> contents only on timestamp change. Maybe with checking the file stamp only
> once per second at most.
Isn't inotify what should be used in such cases?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
