2) I don't understand what else then space saving and e.g. optimization of install media should be the reason for the split.
But given that the split as well as the recommends are correct, then I'll probably ask to remove the `exiv2` from the install media via kickstart or whatever is the right way to customize the install media content.
Vít Dne 13. 07. 23 v 15:45 Rex Dieter napsal(a):
I don't see any good reason to change here. Mostly because the status quo is already a compromise to leave the base package as an optional Recommends (ie, removable).This is considering that most of the space in question here are translations, that strictly-speaking, probably ought to be included in the -libs package anyway. if those files were moved, the space saving for the base package would be negligible.On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 7:42 AM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: (now hopefully with correct maintainer email) Dne 13. 07. 23 v 14:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 10. 07. 23 v 10:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> >> exiv2 >> >> > > So this is pulled in by exiv2-libs: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/blob/rawhide/f/exiv2.spec#_53-58 > > I am not sure I agree with the comment `# not strictly required, but > convenient and expected`. But I think dependencies like this should be > reevaluated at least in the install media context. This would save 4+ > MB of space. > > Or is the exiv2 maintainer (in CC) going to revisit this dependency? > > > Vít >
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
