On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:06 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> Yes I think it's better if you could proceed with brltty.
>
> Note I pushed a commit earlier today which excludes %{ix86} from the
> OCaml subpackage. In OCaml 5 / Fedora 39 we are going to drop support
> for this architecture entirely.
>
> > - build bumped icu in your side-tag too, so brlapi rebuilt there
> > would be built both against new icu and new ocaml?
>
> I'm not sure whether or not this is necessary, but in any case don't
> worry as I will sort it out when doing the OCaml rebuild.
>
> Rich.
>
FYI, it seems brltty is failing anyway on i686, with:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
( https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103241186 )
Adding limb to CC.
--
Best regards / S pozdravem,
František Zatloukal
Senior Quality Engineer
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
