On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 5:41 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > Wouldn't it be better to just update OpenCascade to its new upstream > version in that sidetag as well instead of doing a compat package for it? > > Define better. > To be clear, I'm not "doing a compat package" for it. I'm just > changing one line in the spec file and rebuilding it against > tbb2020.3-devel (which is currently identical to tbb-devel). > That just means the OpenCascade package in rawhide won't be broken > when tbb gets updated. > > > The new OpenCascade actually requires the new TBB and can't be built > with the older version. See > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217295. > > Yes, I'm aware of the bugzilla (it's blocked by #2036372 which is this > change). > There's no guarantee that the new version won't have new issues and not be a simple update and rebuild. I don't want to hold things up. For that reason I'm good with the plan as is. Once things have settled in Rawhide I can do test builds of the new version with latest TBB. Thanks, Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
