Thanks, Florian, very good point. On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:12 PM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I think this will make quite a few packages FTBFS on i686 because they > require pandoc at build time. It's not that many—I count ~75 that > build-depend on something pandoc-ish without also build-depending on > something ghc-ish. The actual number will be lower once we stop > building noarch packages on i686 (not yet implemented as far as I know). > And there are probably some packages which build-depend indirectly on > ghc. Then I guess it will have to wait then. It is not that big a deal yet: though a few i686 issues are slowly starting to creep in for a few Haskell packages. Jens
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
