On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:42 AM Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote:
> [...] > > Any Fedora packager can rebuild a package into f39-app using 'fepdkg > > build --target=f39-app'. > > > [...] > > Once a package exists in f39-app or f38-app, then > > [[ > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/ci-cd/distrosync/distrobuildsync > > distrobuildsync]] will be used to do a build into f39-app each time a > > standard build completes. > > > Do I understand correctly that flapaks containing the same package actually > reuses the same package build? E.g. if a flatpak for Firefox requires a nss > package and a flatpak for Thunderbird requires the same nss package, then > nss > is built into f39-app only once and both Firefox and Thunderbird flapaks > are > created from the same nss package build? > Yes, that's the idea. While we had the theoretical ability to build libraries differently when bundling into different Flatpaks, in the vast majority of cases, we did not use that capability. > Because if there were a need for rebuilding the same package for different > flapaks differently, using a single Koji target would not not work. A Koji > tag > only presents the latest build of a package. > Yep. The side tag mechanism could possibly be used if a situation arose where we *did* need different builds, but I don't see that need. - Owen
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
