On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:30 PM Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Dne 28. 03. 23 v 16:01 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > Hmm, that'd mean thousands of pull requests… I think if we agree to > > this, it would make sense to just push a fix directly. Each pull request > > ticket is a few mails, and with 8096 expected pull requests, that is > > quite a lot of churn. > > I am trying to be as polite as possible. And respectful to work of > maintainers. > > Rel-engs bumping release because of mass-rebuild is trivial thing and > doing direct push is right thing. > > But is the change of the license string trivial thing? I do not know. If > most people (and FESCO) tell me "yeah, push > directly" then I can push directly. PRs are definitelly more work for me > (and owners of this proposal). But I am willing > to do that. > Yes, please push directly. I completely agree with Zbigniew and don't think that PRs work super well for mass changes like this. However, this definitely needs FESCo approval first and communication ( https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/) before pushing. Package changes are tracked in git and it's trivial for a package maintainer to revert it for an individual package if needed. -- Kalev
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
