On 2010-11-29, Rahul Sundaram <methe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/29/2010 08:04 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: >> I do not get the idea why I should filter some irrelevant mails if >> better is to not sent them. Especially if I cannot solve the subject of >> the mail. Yeah, the subject is somobody does not did his job. I cannot >> imagine the knowledge would help me in my packager duties. > > I am sorry but "somebody does not did his job"? It is not the "job" of > anyone to test packages for you. They are merely helping out and we > will get more help if we express gratitude instead of a sense of > entitlement. > I do not accuse anybody not duing his job. I just complain the mails are absolutly irrelevant from point of view of package maintainer who pushed the package. You can replace the `job' with `expected duty' or `role'.
I could worry about my packages not being stabilized, however that would be all I could do and it would have no effect. Frankly, I don't care about stable-status of my packages as that are Fedora rules that draw line between packager and tester `duties' in package update. I could become proven tester to test (not only) my own packages, however such cheating would be silly. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
