On Sunday, 26 March 2023 01:56:32 CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Two weeks ago we had:
> > * 23107 spec files in Fedora
> > 
> > * 29503license tags in all spec files
> > 
> > * 20302 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
> > 
> > * 8096 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
> 
> Today we have:
> 
> * 22882 spec files in Fedora
> 
> * 29366license tags in all spec files
> 
> * 19784 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet(huray, we are under 20k)
> 
> * 7912tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
> 
> The list of packages needed to be converted is again here:
> 
> https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-fi
> nal.txt
> 
> List by package maintainers is here
> 
> https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-fi
> nal-maintainers.txt

Looking into this it lists for example:

libtermkey           asn salimma


The spec file of libtermkey has:

  License:        MIT


Now going to https://spdx.org/licenses/ and looking for the SPDX Identifier 
shows:

MIT License     MIT


What am I supposed to do as a maintainer of libtermkey?



Best regards


        Andreas

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to