On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski <beleg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding > > build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer > > perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever. > > Not to mention being quite wasteful from the resources perspective as > > mame builds take quite a while. > > While not much can be done now, can we make sure that the mass rebuild > > builds do not get garbage collected, or at least the build logs are > > saved somewhere? Thanks. > > As far as I know, at least some form of truncated build.log used to > get attached when FTBFS bugs were filed after a mass rebuild ... maybe > this time this wasn't possible, because bugs were reported *weeks* > after the mass rebuild?
yes, thats exactly why. > And I agree, having no logs at all for something that takes a long > time to build is annoying :( Sorry about that. ;( kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
