Bill C a écrit : > I am going to ask because I am curious. Is systemd a good resolving > server? I normally don't run servers but I find this thread interesting. I use named + ( NM or systemd-resolved )
Good or not, I don't know. It is causing me issues... > Everyone seems to want to shutdown systemd-resolver and go to network > manager. At least that's how I have been interpreting this. I give you numbers: * 2 servers impacted * 4 servers not impacted * 2 VMs not impacted * 1 desktop not impacted As mentionned before, systemd package edit /etc/resolv.conf, meaning the use of systemd-resolved is enforced. All my machines are using systemd-resolved without issue. This bug is rare and I'm not able to reproduce it, actually. The systemd package, by reseting /etc/resolv.conf, was not helping me. This is why I asked. -- GnuPG: AE157E0B29F0BEF2 at keys.openpgp.org CA Cert: https://dl.casperlefantom.net/pub/ssl/root.der Jabber/XMPP Messaging: cas...@casperlefantom.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
