On 1/17/23 14:28, Till Hofmann wrote:
Hi all,Someone (rightfully) suggested that we should build glfw twice, once with wayland support and once without:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152319Is there any best practice how to build the same package in two different flavors, in this case cmake-based? I vaguely remember seeing a spec file that did that, but I don't remember where.Thanks for any pointers!
In vtk.spec I do things like:
%global _vpath_builddir build
%cmake %{cmake_gen} \
%{vtk_cmake_options} \
-DVTK_BUILD_DOCUMENTATION:BOOL=ON \
-DVTK_BUILD_EXAMPLES:BOOL=ON \
-DVTK_BUILD_TESTING:BOOL=ON
%cmake_build -- --output-sync
%cmake_build --target DoxygenDoc
%if %{with mpich}
%global _vpath_builddir build-mpich
%_mpich_load
export CC=mpicc
export CXX=mpic++
%cmake %{cmake_gen} \
%{vtk_cmake_options} \
-DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH:PATH=$MPI_HOME \
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=$MPI_HOME \
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=lib \
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_JNILIBDIR:PATH=lib/%{name} \
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_QMLDIR:PATH=lib/qt5/qml \
-DVTK_USE_MPI:BOOL=ON
%cmake_build -- --output-sync
%_mpich_unload
%endif
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
