On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 3:38 AM Sandro <li...@penguinpee.nl> wrote: > On 16-01-2023 08:56, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: > > Above change seems like a clear improvement to me, making the most used > > option the default. But I have noticed that workflows differ wildly > > between packagers, so before submitting any code for review, I would > > like to hear if somebody regularly uses the default form 'fedpkg > > scratch-build' and thinks it currently does the right thing. > > +1 for the PR. > > So far I haven't used the scratch-build command. I always use build, > since I need to supply extra options anyway to start a scratch build > from local HEAD. This change would make me use the scratch-build command > instead. >
Since `fedpkg scratch-build` bombs out with an error if you've made local changes I propose a slight modification: If no changes are made then it does a normal scratch build for the "does this still build / not build" 1% use case If there are local changes it automatically uploads an SRPM for the 99% use case. If you end up in a weird state, i.e. made changes but for some reason want to do a "normal" scratch build you have a few different ways to accomplish that. Thanks, Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
