On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:52:38AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> ==29692== 30 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record
> 917 of 2,602
> ==29692==    at 0x484386F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:393)
> ==29692==    by 0x14806539: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x14BA7D87: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x14BA7DFC: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x14B86D88: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x146ED193: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1475E205: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1475E71A: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1475ED49: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x146EF09F: ???

This has the hallmark of missing glibc debuginfo.  What's the output
of this command?

$ rpm -qa | grep glibc | sort

Rich.

> ==29692==    by 0x4A5D0E7: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1931)
> ==29692==    by 0x4A42C1F: g_object_new_internal (gobject.c:2228)
> ==29692==    by 0x4A44247: g_object_new_with_properties (gobject.c:2391)
> ==29692==    by 0x4A44FF0: g_object_new (gobject.c:2037)
> ==29692==    by 0x146F5395: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x145D820C: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x145E06E3: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1276D0: pk_backend_load (pk-backend.c:569)
> ==29692==    by 0x135D1A: pk_engine_load_backend (pk-engine.c:967)
> ==29692==    by 0x119468: main (pk-main.c:219)
> 
> ==29692== 158,863 (8,192 direct, 150,671 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks
> are definitely lost in loss record 2,602 of 2,602
> ==29692==    at 0x48486AF: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1451)
> ==29692==    by 0x14805D7B: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x148062D6: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1480DA3F: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1480FCAB: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x14B86DF5: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x146ED193: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1475E205: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1475E71A: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1475ED49: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x146EF09F: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x4A5D0E7: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1931)
> ==29692==    by 0x4A42C1F: g_object_new_internal (gobject.c:2228)
> ==29692==    by 0x4A44247: g_object_new_with_properties (gobject.c:2391)
> ==29692==    by 0x4A44FF0: g_object_new (gobject.c:2037)
> ==29692==    by 0x146F5395: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x145D820C: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x145E06E3: ???
> ==29692==    by 0x1276D0: pk_backend_load (pk-backend.c:569)
> ==29692==    by 0x135D1A: pk_engine_load_backend (pk-engine.c:967)
> ==29692==    by 0x119468: main (pk-main.c:219)
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to