On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10. 01. 23 13:52, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Second, how exactly are you building the package? > > Looking at [1], you used "Source Type: SRPM or .spec file upload". > > How was it generated? > > > > [1] > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/OIIO/build/5210045/ > > < > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/OIIO/build/5210045/> > > > > Both 'fedpkg srpm' and uploading that to copr, and letting copr > build from > > dist-git should result in the expected release. (Though without > other steps > > it'll still be the same as the version in Fedora release, so you'll > need > > to tell dnf to install that specific build.) > > > > > > Looks like the problem is using `rpkg` but that's the easiest method and > has > > worked great until now... > > For the record I've reported several issues with the rpkg method over the > years. The distgit method was partially a response for those. tl;dr rpkg > "works > great" until it doesn't because it does not work like fedpkg, but instead > it is > a pre-processor for templated spec files that happens to work in most of > the > cases with bare spec files as well. > I didn't realize the fedpkg had grown the ability to do COPR builds. I will use that from now on. Thanks, Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
