Miro Hrončok wrote:
> * ACTION: bcotton to make a proposal on the mailing list to explicitly
> require full resubmission of rejected proposals (and then bring it
> to a FESCo ticket once discussion has happened) (mhroncok,
> 18:36:36)
So FESCo is willing to prevent this from happening again in the future, but
NOT to remedy the existing wrongdoing?
The only issue that was addressed was excluding architectures almost nobody
uses anyway (i686, which has been multilibs-only for years, and s390x, which
is for hardware no normal user has at home). x86_64 users will be hit by the
performance hit of this change due to the irregularly reached decision, and
nothing is being done to repair this before the damage is done.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
