On Sun, 2022-12-11 at 20:23 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Kofler via devel:
> 
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Looking at sizes, iwlwifi firmware alone is 75M(!) ath10k is 6.8M,
> > > ath11k is 12M, ath6k is 812K, so that's nearly another 20M. brcm/ is
> > > another 6.4M and I *think* that's all wifi. There's a few other minor
> > > ones, but that's a little over 100M of just wifi, with Intel by a huge
> > > margin the worst offender.
> > >  
> > > Does anyone know anyone we can talk to at Intel about this? It's pretty
> > > obnoxious.
> > 
> > It's the same situation as for some of the GPU firmwares: They have 
> > submitted as vendor driver to upstream, which does very little, together 
> > with a huge proprietary firmware, which does most of the real work. 
> > Hardware 
> > manufacturers love playing that trick.
> 
> Uhm, part of the problem is that firmware versions which cannot be
> loaded by the kernel are not removed upstream, or in the linux-firmware
> package.  The wifi firmware file I use is just 450 KiB compressed, but
> that turns into 6.8 MiB compressed due to this kind of near-duplication.
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't see an easy way to discover which firmware files
> the kernel can ever load.

I'm working on this with Peter and the Intel firmware folks ATM.
There's a PR at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-firmware/pull-request/9 , and
Intel folks seem receptive to the idea of removing at least some of the
older ones upstream too.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to