Hi Adam, On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:30 AM Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 03:28 +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:42 AM Adam Williamson > > <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi folks! Today I woke up and found > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 , which diverted > me > > > down a bit of an "installer environment size" rabbit hole. > > > > Does the "new and improved" web based installer help this > > in any way? > > I haven't looked yet but I suspect it'll probably be a wash, mostly. If > anything it's likely slightly negative because the new installer itself > hard requires webkitgtk, so we can't really do anything to finesse that > requirement any more. With the old installer, we could maybe try and > figure out some way of being able to show the help pages without > needing yelp/webkitgtk. Since the new installer itself needs webkitgtk, > seems like there's no way we're getting rid of that ~40M compressed. > You should also try to do this - remove webkitgtk and yelp packages and add firefox, because that's what the web based installer should/will use in the end - see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142779. We already had a meeting with Anaconda dev and told him to use Firefox instead of WebKitGTK for the web installer - due to resources that are internally (and frankly in upstream as well) allocated to WebKitGTK. Tom
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
