Il 06/12/22 00:08, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 22:44 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >> Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >>> Or let's just get rid of Bodhi and trust all packagers to "know exactly >>> what they are doing with their package". >> Yes please! > Exhibits 1 through 2636 for why this is a bad idea: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=&status=unpushed&page=1
Obviously, I was sarcastic about getting rid of Bodhi (otherwise, how can I better spend 2 hours per day on average of my free time other than trying to fix things in it?.... :-p ). That's why I think that, having a tool to prevent (as much as possible) things to break, we should not permit every user to bypass the workflow. Mattia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
