On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 10:06 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 6:32 PM Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:
>>
>> Final statement, instead of wasting my time and energy on arguments,
>> Imagemagick7 could already be built on rawhide if someone had done the
>> package review for me
>
>
> I understand the sentiment as another person who has donated 1000s of hours 
> to packaging on Fedora, but the "default" package SHOULD be the current 
> latest package. It' just part of "Fedora First".
>
> So my vote (as much as it matters) is that all packages should be built with 
> the latest version in COPR to verify compatibility, and the ones that don't, 
> build with an ImageMagik 6 compat package.
>
I've got this mostly worked out now:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/ImageMagick7-dev/

There are five failures:

* autotrace - plan to notify upstream
* dvdauthor - point to GraphicsMagick or IM6, plan to notify upstream
* q - dead upstream, planned to point to IM6
* vdr-skinnopacity - current upstream dead, plan to notify new upstream
* vdr-tvguide - plan to notify upstream

I've got an IM6 compat package made (forked from current IM):
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/ImageMagick7-dev/build/5081492/



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to