On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 10:06 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 6:32 PM Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote: >> >> Final statement, instead of wasting my time and energy on arguments, >> Imagemagick7 could already be built on rawhide if someone had done the >> package review for me > > > I understand the sentiment as another person who has donated 1000s of hours > to packaging on Fedora, but the "default" package SHOULD be the current > latest package. It' just part of "Fedora First". > > So my vote (as much as it matters) is that all packages should be built with > the latest version in COPR to verify compatibility, and the ones that don't, > build with an ImageMagik 6 compat package. >
I've got this mostly worked out now: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/ImageMagick7-dev/ There are five failures: * autotrace - plan to notify upstream * dvdauthor - point to GraphicsMagick or IM6, plan to notify upstream * q - dead upstream, planned to point to IM6 * vdr-skinnopacity - current upstream dead, plan to notify new upstream * vdr-tvguide - plan to notify upstream I've got an IM6 compat package made (forked from current IM): https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/ImageMagick7-dev/build/5081492/ -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue