On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 8:24 PM Ben Cotton <bcot...@redhat.com> wrote:

> === Items in progress ===
> * Add `%perl_require_compat` macro to ''perl-srpm-macros'' in F38
> * Add `%perl_require_compat` macro to ''perl-srpm-macros'' in F37
> * Add `%perl_require_compat` macro to ''perl-srpm-macros'' in F36
> * Add `%perl_require_compat` macro to ''perl-srpm-macros'' in F35
> * Add `%perl_require_compat` macro to ''perl-srpm-macros'' in RHEL 9
> * Update [[Packaging:Perl | Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Perl]]
> * Replace ''perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_XXX)'' by `%perl_require_compat`
> run-time in all F38 spec files (3259)

For those of us that prefer linear (and release agnostic)
spec files, could the %perl_require_compat macro
for el7, and el8, simply map to the classic MODULE_COMPAT...
syntax without the need for expression expansion (no
improvement, but no regression, either)?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to