On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 09:00 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking for a clear answer in the packaging docs to the > question whether > package nevr must be always higher in later releases. I recall people > saying that > now 'distro-upgrade' is the recommended upgrade method and the > requirement of > keeping the upgrade path without downgrades isn't there anymore. > (This comes up > in the semiannual discussion about upgrade tests.) > > But I don't see an unambiguous statement in the Packaging Guidelines > either way. > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_rawhide_is_allowed_to_lag_temporarily > says that Rawhide is partially exempt, which stongly implies that > other branches > are _not_ exempt.
Correct assumption, only rawhide allows remove an bump version package, but is not about upgrade path I think > So… has there been any change of the Guidelines on this and where is > the official policy documented? > > Zbyszek > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
