On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, 10:09 Remi Collet, <fed...@famillecollet.com> wrote:
> It looks like EPEL-9 is managed like rawhide. > > > 1/ dav1d 1.0.0 update (also in F37) > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-40bb8ce9c5 > > This introduce a soname change breaking lot of stuff > including libavif (from EPEL) and packages in RPMFusion > > 2/ libavif 0.11.1 update (only in Rawhide) > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-385df27ee1 > > This fix the issue with libdav1d, but introduce another soname bump > > > This is a real nightmare. > > ** Please, manage EPEL-9 like a "stable" branch. ** > > soname change should be avoid, > if not possible (security exception ?) should be properly managed > and, at least, announced > > > /me is disappointed > > > Remi > > > Those are my packages but I don't recall authoring such changes? I remember considering David 1.0.0 for EPEL9 but didn't do so because of the dependency nightmare. Best regards, Robert-André
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
