(hmm, never seemed to get the first mail...)

Just recaping infos I got/researched for nixos.

Fabio Valentini wrote on Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 04:32:35PM +0100:
>> I was NOT able to build following packages with libbpf 1.0:
>>
>>    - bcc (needs 0.25 update first)

note bcc upgrade in turns breaks gobpf, which indirectly breaks stuff
like oci-seccomp-bpf-hook.
gobpf got updated in https://github.com/iovisor/gobpf/pull/311
(unreleased, but we don't package it directly so we probably don't care)

oci-seccomp-bpf-hook got updated with it in v1.2.8 so that will need an
update. Didn't check if there are other reverse dependencies on gobpf in
fedora.
This one is backwards compatible, so the hook can be updated first with
no side effect.

>>    - bpftrace (needs bcc update first)

(update with bcc 0.25 works, so just needs updating together with bcc.
Conversely older bpftrace does not work with bcc 0.25 iirc so it's not
just one after the other, but both together...)

>>    - knot

knot got fixed in 3.2.1 and also "just" needs to be updated.
https://gitlab.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/-/tags/v3.2.1

>>    - suricata

suricata got fixed in https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/7884
included in 7.0.0-beta1 last week, so will probably need to wait for an
actual release...

>>    - below
>>    - rust-libbpf-cargo
>>    - openvswitch

(didn't see/check these for nixos)

-- 
Dominique
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to